Why America’s central bank needs Powell to stay on at the Fed as Trump turns up the pressure

1 day ago 2
ARTICLE AD BOX

Copyright © HT Digital Streams Limited
All Rights Reserved.

Public servants such as Powell have been willing to stand up to Trump’s misguided bullying.  (REUTERS) Public servants such as Powell have been willing to stand up to Trump’s misguided bullying. (REUTERS)

Summary

As Donald Trump escalates his pressure campaign against Jerome Powell, the battle is no longer just about interest rates. It’s about whether the Federal Reserve can resist political intimidation. This is why Powell should stay on as a governor after his term as chief ends.

These are officially the darkest days for Federal Reserve independence since at least the Nixon administration. After attacking Fed Governor Lisa Cook last year, US President Donald Trump is now weaponizing the Justice Department against Chair Jerome Powell in a thinly veiled effort to intimidate him into lowering interest rates against the best interests of the American people. It’s something you’d expect in a tin-pot banana republic and it will be a stain on America’s reputation for years to come.

The attack is a sign of why America needs principled leaders at its central bank—and why Powell himself should opt to stay on as a governor after his chairmanship ends in May.

Speaking to the American people on Sunday, Powell said the US central bank had been served grand jury subpoenas threatening a criminal indictment related to his June congressional testimony on renovations of the Fed’s headquarters. In his strong response, he characterized the scrutiny of the renovations and his testimony last year as mere pretexts.

“The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President," Powell said Sunday. “This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions—or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation."

Independent central banks deliver the best outcomes, both in the US and abroad. Without adequate firewalls, presidents can use the central bank to juice the economy and boost their electoral fortunes, leaving an inflationary mess for subsequent administrations.

That was the case with Richard Nixon, who appointed his former economic counsellor Arthur Burns as Fed chair and joked about lower interest rates at Burns’ swearing in ceremony. It took decades to build back the Fed’s credibility, which Trump seems intent on squandering.

Trump’s demands for vastly lower rates defy economic reality. Policymakers are juggling lingering inflation with a wobbly labour market, while trying to size up the economic impacts of a massive shift in global trade policies and an AI revolution.

In response to the uncertainty, they have been prudently cutting rates very gradually, and may conceivably lower them further if the economic data demands it. Trump, by contrast, wants to throw caution to the wind and rapidly ease policy at the risk of re-igniting inflation.

Fortunately, Powell is no Burns. The Fed is also getting some help from Senator Thom Tillis, who promised to oppose any Trump nominees to the Fed “until this legal matter is fully resolved." At a time when Trump is poised to nominate a new Fed chair, that could prevent the president’s candidates from advancing out of the Senate Banking Committee.

Powell should now buck tradition and strongly consider serving out his term on the Board of Governors until 2028 after his chairmanship ends this May. He has proved to be a powerful moral leader of an institution under fire and his vote would help create a bulwark against further Trump meddling. For Congress, Trump’s attacks are a reminder of why lawmakers must demand absolute independence from any future chair.

In a demonstration of how foolish and self-destructive the Justice Department manoeuvre is, the Fed news initially prompted the S&P 500 Index to retreat and yields on the 10-year Treasury note to rise. While the Fed sets short-term policy rates, mortgage rates and other long-term borrowing costs are set by the market. Ill-advised rate cuts can actually lead to greater interest expenses for consumers.

Even so, the stock market was already recovering an hour after it opened. No one should bank on financial markets to discipline the president. Trump’s tariffs have taught traders to not take too seriously the administration’s every move, but the long-term damage of diminished Fed credibility shouldn’t be underestimated.

For now, it’s unclear that the Justice Department’s actions would fundamentally change the near-term trajectory for monetary policy. That’s because public servants such as Powell and Tillis have been willing to stand up to Trump’s misguided bullying. It’s also because the Fed is staffed with principled technocrats who believe in the institution’s mission. It’s an institutional structure that was built to withstand executive-branch meddling.

Unfortunately, the Trump administration’s latest overreach shows that we cannot take anything for granted. That’s why Powell should commit to stay in the fight as long as necessary. ©Bloomberg

The author is a Bloomberg columnist focused on US markets and economics.

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

more

topics

Read Next Story footLogo

Read Entire Article